Tari Protocol Discussion 36
On Thursday, the Tari community discussed the Validator Node committee selection strategy. Below is the TL;DR on Thursday’s conversation (full transcript included below):
- Asset issuer has full control
- Selects VN’s he wants for his/her asset
Join us for our next discussion on Freenode in #tari-dev.
Discussion times proposed by the Tari community:
Mondays: 6pm CAT (12pm EST)
Thursdays: 11am CAT (5am EST)
To keep up with the latest Tari developments, you can follow the project on Twitter.
Transcript of Thursday’s discussion
11:00 <@CjS77> It's dev chat time - Today's topic: Validator Node committee selection 11:01 <@CjS77> See https://rfc.tari.com/RFC-0311_AssetTemplates.html for some context on VN committee selection options RFC-0311: Digital Asset templates - The Tari Network: RFC library The Tari network RFC library and documentation 11:04 <@CjS77> With `CREATOR_ASSIGNED` committees, the process should look something like: 11:04 <@CjS77> 1. Asset Issuer (AI) submits an asset creation instruction with a list of VNs he/she wants in his/her committee 11:04 <@CjS77> 2. There's a timeout within which nominated VNs need to accept their nomination 11:07 <Hansie2> So we assume VN discovery is done and that the asset issuer has a list of viable VNs... 11:07 <simian_za> For CREATOR_ASSIGNED that assumption will be correct I believe 11:08 <@CjS77> 3. After the timeout (let's call it nomination period), if insufficient VNs from the `trusted_node_set` haven't accepted the nomination, then the instruction should be rejected. 11:08 <Blackwolfsa> I dont think we have to assume, I think the AI needs to wait for VN's he doesnt poll VN's they poll him 11:09 <@CjS77> "Rejection" means either an explicit rejection message from the AI, or it hits a timeout 11:12 <Hansie> Ok, makes sense, then the asset issuer has to try again 11:12 <neonknight64> Will creator_assigned and network_assigned be managed by the Token Wallet? 11:12 <Blackwolfsa> I think so 11:12 <@CjS77> Yes, we could also consider a case where the AI puts out N pubkeys, and selects a committee m < N from that 11:16 <Hansie> Another method could be (a) this is the asset I want to create/created, (b) VNs please tell me if you are interested, (c) thank you I selected these VNs. 11:24 <@CjS77> Agree - Asset creation instruction issuance -> Nomination phase -> Asset initialisation / creation phase 11:25 <@CjS77> With timeouts in each phase 11:26 <neonknight64> I think the AI could privately ask VNs to be part if a committee or broadcast a public request to all the VNs and then select the committee from the subset of VNs that accepted the request. The nomination phase can be private or public. 11:26 <@CjS77> For `CREATOR_ASSIGNED` that makes sense 11:55 <Hansie> Maybe we also need a fee locked up in the base layer that coincide with the initial asset creation instruction 11:56 <Hansie> That could be value in the clear linked as metadata, in such a way it could be validated by prospective VNs 11:57 <simian_za> Ok, so the AI will put an Asset Creation transaction on the base layer with a time lock as long as the nomination period and as you say put the value he is locking up in the clear so that it can be verified by prospective VN's 11:59 <simian_za> then to start the nomination process for CREATOR_ASSIGNED the AI will send a nomination message directly to their selected prospective VNs or for NETWORK_ASSIGNED assets the call for nomination will be broadcast on the network publically 12:01 <neonknight64> Once the VNs have received the call to be part of the committee that could manage the newly created asset, they could nominated themselves to the Token wallet of the AI. 12:02 <simian_za> yes that makes sense 12:02 <Blackwolfsa> The AI will then select and inform the VN's whom it selected based on some token wallet criteria 12:03 <neonknight64> The TokenWallet could also prioritise the VNs that accepted according to things like reliability etc. 12:04 <stanimal> VN's could then post their collateral 12:04 <simian_za> on the base layer right? 12:04 <stanimal> Yup 12:06 <Hansie> Great, so when all of this are done, the asset issuer and committee ca perform the 1st checkpoint Tx on the base layer and the committee can start to manage the asset. 12:06 <simian_za> ship it